Mrs. Hema D. Katariya v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The DrAT noted that the Respondent Bank failed to file a reply to the appellant's application seeking waiver of the security deposit. The matter was postponed for hearing on the waiver application on 20.04.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 109/2023 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 59/2023
Between
Hema D. Katariya … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s
Mr Vandan Kumar, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Ketaki Rege, i/b Ms Sandhya Sondhi, Advocate for Respondent No.1
-: Order dated: 10/03/2023:-
No reply has been filed by the Respondent Bank on the application for waiver of deposit.
Post on 20.04.2023 for hearing on the waiver application.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-20
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Respondent Bank is required to file a reply to the application for waiver of deposit under the NCLT/NCLAT rules applicable to the DRAT proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hema D. Katariya
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court