Interpretation of an image-text document showing the header and charge sheet of a first appellate criminal judgment; no substantive ruling is captured in the text provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fi
FARAD
debts recovery appellate tribunal.
MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. .of 20
In I. No.
Appeal No. of 20
Appellants
I /V T^f^~ fry /^=r^~n <rP^
(Advocate ______
J
fllk\ a^c)
Versus
i- &. & t Respondents
9
•
(Advocate
fO • • J- J
H |
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order/Chalrperaonfr Orders
In compl ance with the
onter dated
by the Hon'ble Chairperson in
LA. No.//3^2M^the Appellant
4 has carried out iimendnfent in
the matter on
i
I
| Registrar
jjT'
AAj! AJu' &ni ■goatj
r
QU 1^ Q&r
l| x^-. ‘
/V0- ^s/zo^-
Mlsc
Fi/
irv
y^h
, G ?f2e>io)
^rt" ~ i /> |i ;|
07^2^e>
& // ay
p.ra
rj
Contd Sheet
| . Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar's order / Chairperson’s Orders |
|---|---|
| yU091^^3 | J- RepUj . FotT P’PPella^'^TMo 3 AppKcanA—. Ashish GtHqcJ^ge ) L ■ " r **- . p\s'k^K GxKadg e n/o- b2j3 .. Ackx/> SachiA KaJ'tK \ nl PbTT OirxcA erA' rxjovAC Pott ot^e?5~ pesporxdkr'ks ✓ Pcb. Ftnr Resp'ohcknV VirYA-e. Adj FbTT Qephj -te p\ck'’ Sqchin KojK'Oi f'' x//re. APP’ddvi^ ‘ i -i S^,C«On. pe^zr s pcsj- . ■ T^A-eTrYe-rA-e^ oJvoC aJ~^ ^AaP J"r i . pn fl -9Z4/ -2-0is AhecoftJ °F rQ<Pljc^aDPd'Idnr no+ •Se'D’VeJ Mpon pvp pjJ Id \£cliTr^e . 1 P &-S < choce+! |
| /zzivin&zs | Registrar v/c) The Registrar is on Le^ve. Hence. the Bnqrd r Discharged S.O ForPppKy to/28 |
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
