Bank of Baroda v. Uttamkumar P Nangalia and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Brief text intended for a Board/Appellate Tribunal is unintelligible due to severe OCR corruption. No substantive content is available. The text notes a vacancy ('The Registrar is on Leave, Hence, the Board is Discharged').
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- ’
Date '■■ Ofnde.NoloB, Appearances
and Registrar’s ofdsr I Chairperson’s Orders
x- l-u 'O-ebeii Po'zr AppeHcin-A . t
^huJoham
U /08/2O23
None ^podervb- -I
MmocoH (^roppeHa^^^
SeirVi ce Of- no ^ce upon
^^/09120^3 AdK/. 'VfshoJ Tambe Pott Appdkn A“ -
CJore fb'y- xQesporxcknV-.
pjv- ^ppd^n^-tS'ee^ ■ Hrne
Se^ice no^ce upon ^ord<nk.
£aj';■’ P0-3- n< 1 <rvg PCS / App e^-zrA nee
P-eplj H> I<2 /11/^023.
Fo'zr boH^ •Po0-^«s.
\6/l I Hone
A^-¥=v^-^e€A<— >> i "v w 3x^=sm
l ^^pea-zra^ce ^erK| 4^
A dtj (—©tT P6S
Vo|o/'Zo'^A'
ex) is i~?n^
s ’•
tyx
' ■k’WRAP
BSBTSRECpVEKYAPPELLATE TRiB U NAU MUMBAil
Mlac Application No. Cl J _ of ZOQ^CPes+e'groAfcr^, No, z- In (^P%Ss Appeal Ho, „of 20 19 OispeiSeJ^ op tBcra’oda *
... Appullnntn
(Advoua^Cr-n/S ■ Bhaskas- ShamJ)
Versus
UVVamku.moTf p. rVangcdrq
...Hospoiidonl^
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court