This is an order in a dismissed miscellaneous appeal where the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai recorded attendance. Respondents were served; some appeared or replied, others were set ex-parte for non-appearance. No substantive order on the merits is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 239/2015 (Restoration)
In
(Misc. Appeal No. 60/2014- Disposed of)
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s.
The Official Liquidator of …Respondent/s
M/s. Gujarat Optical Communication Ltd & Ors.
Mr. Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Jay Pandit, i/b Mr. Prashant J. Pandit, Advocate for Respondent No. 6 to 13
-: Order dated: 11/04/2023:-
All the Respondents have been served.
Respondents Nos. 1 and 6 to 13 have appeared. Respondent
Nos. 2 to 5 have not appeared despite being served with the notice by way of publication. Hence, they are called absent and set ex-parte.
The 1st Respondent has not filed any reply. Respondent Nos. 6
to 13 has already filed a reply.
Post on 06.06.2023 for reply/hearing.
psa-15
1
Bank of Baroda
The Official Liquidator of M/s. Gujarat Optical Communication Ltd & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
