M/s Shushma Products and Ors. v. Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The document contains only scanned images and typographic noise with no readable judgment text, making extraction impossible.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f-'-
4
B^BI^RECOVERYAPPELLATE tribunal
JVJUMBAil
"
.
, I.
Mlsc Application No. of 20 ij w
,n -7//a i’-ho. ------------------------
Appeal No. 3£2—of 20 0 £> ’
... Appollnnts
(Advocate
J
Versus
c>^ ^9o4/i? X, Ol£. <1 ....RoGpondonts
(Advocate
J_ J
Dato Office NoteSi Appearances
Roglefrar's order/ Clialrpers6n’o 0rdero
£oiu i thy
pr&wd fir-
nJrt/lA
by-
ot> jorcvfj
j
>- P&z, £: a4>^
-
*
P.T.O.
Date Office Notos, Appearances
and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders
1^/08/20^3 fXdv * Aa'grVt Pe^zr A p peVcfn V—
(N.or>e Q^r jQ-espcn <J en^- <
AdMocoJne. fe«?r Appellon b •^’eelx. -H'm-e
Service oP roH’ce ^pori &r
pile se^rvide afiA'dcWi'P—
l^ppeaOT^ce- '27v/Q5/2^
a4j- fo'tt Po^ •
■
TZ/C-' l»-
12023
Ad^-Aora-VA ^crx/cr^YAQ AppdlQnrb .
f^one Pe?r iP^spo^den}- '
PcI-JOC^ O<= p,ppdlo^«d<
SeTTV'C^ o£noMc< upon ^sP^den^
«1£ service
fe?r po^/Appea^Qnce^Reph/
Z q £11 /QOQ^ ,
Cxlorxe Pott boVH P<5sr4jfcs'
( APf-3 ^eiTAin^C Uj "H 1S<O I fZtQ.^.
pidj PdTT POS (
'tty Pd- Efl-arT'./
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court