The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed a miscellaneous appeal filed by Raj Décor & Ors. against Bank of Baroda for failure to comply with pre-deposit directions.
The appeal and miscellaneous applications were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 88/2022
Between
Raj Décor & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr. Kushal Sawant, i/b Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Shadab Siddiqui, i/b Mr. R.L. Motwani, Advocate for Respondent No.1
The Appellants have not complied with the direction of this Tribunal to make the pre-deposit within the time stipulated despite an extension of time granted twice.
Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Miscellaneous if are dismissed as Applications, any,
infructuous.
psa-12
Sd/Chairperson
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed despite non-compliance with pre-deposit directions.
Raj Décor & Ors.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
