No substantive content found. The document appears to be an administrative order or a defective court extract containing only procedural notes, imaged headers, and a discharge order based on administrative reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i
r1'
■l'
FARAD DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
i
Misc ApplicationIn No. .of 20 llNo._ I
fvV£G Appeal No.
ofZOQ^
PttVv oJh? Lfd
ph oenix
i
... Appellants
i
(Advocate g/zTflJk J C h g yy\ h
J
Versus
‘RjgcvznjJoJ
YAa.'O'SpTTGxAxo.s'h GvjaniTrqm
Respondents
(Advocate. ii J
Office Notes, Appearances
Date Office Notes, Appearances
" and Registrar's -------- ’ order I / Chairperson _ il ’ _ s _ Orders
\2./10/^023 p\cK/ .Shawjo /Pb-^--App^JIan i-
(X/One ’Aa'TT PesporUen P-e^por\dm b h . ■
p;\eJ &< + enSbn
tMv- P'
, 111 <3'f:i ,brv'e-'
pkATTSiS
• 'i: - citpon 'zrespor —
pp^ ^e-zrv ke oP r\ob'^ 1
oj Vo ^'^-d '
Q-
PoJre ex be n d eJ < n
Pespond^nj- P/O'~ I
^e/TT-'h ce upon 1
UjV\ACh. \S bj
o g/l?./'2e;Q3 . :
pdj fb-zT P°S I gppea^n c-C
3
/
I
.(fHoHc & o n Io 7 in
P.T.O.
Contd Sheet
| Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders |
|---|---|
| 0 B/i 2-/2-3 | 1. Due to administrative reason, board discharged. 08/^% /2-g? |
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
