Phoenix Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited v. Paresh Kantilal Dattani
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l :5. ■■ ■ -'M
/ • ’ FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELEATEITRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
LA. NO. : OF 20 Diary No of
In
Diary No.: OF 20 2-C2—>
hs-k' ; Appellants
(Advocate
Versus
■ '/g/12$A
> Mf&rv
r i-- " Respondents
(Advocate
/•
j I ______ ,
Date
Office Notes, Appearance
& Registrar's orcSer / Chairperson's order
t JLx./ ,
A--*H
■ C s.0- twxrd y
u.
Vi
fXdv- 5hobHo. Chavan ' po?r
o £/G5/20l3 ..
pe^pqrx J q n Jr *
N-G^6- poTT
P defects
J o
(Qe rr\ O'"'/
Pott
•
g VSrhatfar
IC
P.T.O.
| Date | Office Notes, Appearance & Registrar's order / Chairperson's order |
|---|---|
| OS-0'1'2-5 •ZG/l0/'20'23 |
s Due to administrative reason, board discharged, os/© ‘•©uetoadministrative reason, *>oarddischarged, 26-)o -2023 (Moiac Pott boH-i Pasr^es, Fcrzr PemovoJ of dcPecte +o OS’/1,2 |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 271090010692022
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court