In an appeal against the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), the appellant failed to pay the pre-deposit despite an extension granted for two instalments. The present I.A. for further extension was dismissed, and the main appeal was set aside as a consequence of non-payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 116/2023 (EoT) In Appeal on Diary No. 35/2022
Between
Nitin Eknath Pawar … Appellant/s
V/s.
Bharat Co-operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd. & Ors.
Mr Praful Chipte, i/b Mr. Sanjay Juvekar, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated: 22/02/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of praecipe dated 14.02.2023 filed by the Appellant seeking urgent relief.
1
Under the circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed. The extension cannot be granted.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-5
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time for pre-deposit should be granted when filed after expiry and initial payment failed?
Nitin Eknath Pawar
Bharat Co-operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
