The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's contention that the miscellaneous appeal has become infructuous due to the third respondent's reply and disposed of the matter without adjudication.
The miscellaneous appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 77/2019
Between
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
MIEL e-Security Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Vinay Deshpande along with Ms. Shobha Chavan, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
S. Tiwari, i/b M/s. Nava Legal, Advocate for Respondent.
N. Krishnan, Advocate for Respondent No.3
-: Order dated: 08/09/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the prayer which is sought in this appeal has now become infructuous, because of the contentions taken by the 3rd Respondent in his reply and hence, the Misc. Appeal is disposed of as infructuous
The Appellant is at liberty to continue the proceedings before
the D.R.T.
psa-34
Sd/Chairperson
1
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
MIEL e-Security Pvt. Ltd.
Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
