Mr Ramesh Narayan Kulthe v. Arcil
Case brief
What is this about?
Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of the miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn following a settlement under an Outline Terms Sheet (OTS) proposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 265/2022
In
Misc. Appeal No. 69/2009
Between
Ramesh Narayan Kulthe … Appellant/s
V/s.
…Respondent/s
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. …Respondent/s Mr Shubham Dubey, i/b Mr Sunil Humbre, Advocate for Appellant. An advocate for the Respondent is present.
-: Order dated: 08/02/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant and the Respondent submitted that the matter has been settled in consequence of the OTS proposal that has been made. The Appellant is therefore filing a pursis for withdrawal of the appeal.
The appeal is therefore disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-7
1
Ramesh Narayan Kulthe
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court