Mr Ramesh Narayan Kulthe v. Arcil
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal heard counsel for both the appellant and the respondent, who submitted that a settlement proposal was ongoing and sought a course of time. The appeal was subsequently posted for hearing on 29.11.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 69/2009
Between Mr Ramesh Narayan Kulthe … Appellant/s V/s. Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. …Respondent/s Ms Dimple Tejani, i/b M/s. Legal Ventures, Advocate for Respondent. -: Order dated 27/10/2022:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant and the Respondent submitted that there is a proposal of settlement going on, and are seeking time.
Post on 29.11.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-31
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr Ramesh Narayan Kulthe
- respondent
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court