This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 57/2022 (Amendment)
In
Misc. Appeal No. 57/2019
Between
Shilpa Goldie Sud & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Goldie Sud, Appellant present in person
Mr. R.A. Shah & Aditya S, i/b M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 2 to 6
Heard both sides. The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent has no objections in allowing the prayer 9 (b) to 9 (h) and 11 to be added to the existing Appeal Memorandum. Other prayers cannot be allowed because it is incorporating a new prayer that cannot be entertained at the appellate stage. The challenge in the appeal regarding the disposal of the S.A. in terms of consent is already challenged and has to be considered on its merits in this appeal.
Hence, the aforesaid amendment to the extent it is allowed shall be carried out within two weeks. The amended copy of the appeal memorandum shall be furnished to the counsel appearing for the Respondent.
Post on 16.03.2023 before the Registrar for reporting compliance of carrying out amendment.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-22
1
Shilpa Goldie Sud
Bank of Maharashtra
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court