Misc. Appeal No. 47/2011 was dismissed for default due to the absence of legal representation for the appellants seeking time for instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 59/2011
In
Misc. Appeal No. 47/2011
Between
M/s. Modern Windows & Rolling Shutters Mfg. Co. & Anr.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Central Bank of India …Respondent/s
There is no representation for the Appellants or the Respondent.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants had sought time to get specific instructions.
In view of the fact, that there is no representation for the Appellants, I assume that the Appellants are not keen on prosecuting the appeal and hence, the appeal is dismissed for default
Misc. Application, if any, is dismissed as infructous.
Chairperson
rm-22
1
M/s. Modern Windows & Rolling Shutters Mfg. Co. & Anr.
Central Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
