Kirtikumar Jethmal Bafna v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal disposed of as infructous due to deferred possession steps required by the respondent bank under Section 14.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No.287/2023
In
Appeal No. 30/2023
Between
Kirtikumar Jethmal Bafna … Appellant/s V/s.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Meghnath Navlani, along with Mr. Kushal Sawant, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Vinay Deshpande, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated: 20/06/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent Bank submits that
the taking over possession has been deferred and fresh steps need to be taken for taking possession of property u/s 14.
In view of the submission made, the appeal has become
infructous and hence the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-27
1
Kirtikumar Jethmal Bafna
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court