The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal refused an adjournment sought by the appellant. Consequently, the court dismissed application IA 1019/2015 for non-prosecution and rejected the appealed matter MA 37/2013.
Application IA 1019/2015 dismissed for non-prosecution; Appeal MA 37/2013 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 16th day of November, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 1019/2015 (Grant Leave) In
MA 37/2013
(Appeal No.8/2010 in Misc. Application Nos.33 & 34/2007 in DRC No.63/06
in TA No.7/01 on the file of DRT-II, chennai)
Between
ARCIL – ARMS, Rep. by its Authorised Officer, 715-C, 7th Floor, Spencer Plaza, Phase II, No.769, Anna Salai Chennai 600 002.
….Appellant
And
G-3, Aiswaryam Apartment,
21, MRL Colony, 3rd Street, Periya Kodangayur, Chenai 600 118
1
Plot No.1870, 1st Block, 26h Street, Tiruvallur Kudiyiruppu, Anna Nagar West, Chennai 600 040.
…..Respondents
Counsel for Appellant : Shri K. Moorthy & Co. Counsel for R1, R2,R3 & R9 : Ms. I. Sivakami Counsel for R6 : M/s M. Devaraj & Co.
R4 & R5 remained ex parte .
2
ORDER
No representation for R6. Ld. Counsel for R1, R2, R3 & R9 reported ready.
Advocate representing Petitioner/Appellant Institution sought further time despite the matter is posted today under the caption of ‘dismissal’. Request for further time is refused.
In view of the same, Application IA 1019/2015 (Grant Leave) is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, Appeal MA 37/2013 is rejected.
Sd/[Justice S. Ravi Kumar] CHAIRPERSON
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeal and application op should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
ARCIL – ARMS
Y. Sampath
S. Selvaperumal
S. Saravanakumar
C.J. Soundararajan
Mrs. Baby
S. Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
