This is a brief order from the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissing an application for grant of leave due to non-prosecuation, leading to the rejection of Appeal MA 37/2013.
Application IA 1019/2015 dismissed; Appeal MA 37/2013 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 1019/2015
in
M.A:37/2013
Arcil V/S Y.Sampath& Ors
16/11/2023
No representation for R6. Ld. Counsel for R1, R2, R3 & R9 reported ready.
Advocate representing Petitioner/Appellant Institution sought further time despite the matter is posted today under the caption of ‘dismissal’. Request for further time is refused.
In view of the same, Application IA 1019/2015 (Grant Leave) is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, Appeal MA 37/2013 is rejected.
Sd/-
Chairperson
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arcil
Y.Sampath
Ors
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
