In order to allow g to 4 weeks time to the appellant after hanging theись petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay that was allowed orally. The appeal against the said order remains pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 880/2022
Between
Anil S/o Shantaram Sangtani & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Tata Capital Finance Service Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr Habib Ansari, i/b A.H. Lohiya, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Shadab S., Advocate for Respondent
The order of this Tribunal in I.A. 451/2022 was challenged in Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay. Though the said Writ Petition was dismissed, four weeks' time was granted to the Appellant, and the parties were directed to maintain the status quo.
It is now submitted by the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant that an SLP has been preferred before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, and hence, awaits the orders if any.
Post on 08.03.2023 for awaiting orders of SLP.
psa-16
1
Anil S/o Shantaram Sangtani & Ors.
Tata Capital Finance Service Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
