The Tribunal noted that the required security amount had been deposited as directed, implying the disposal of the appeal on merits or based on compliance.
The appeal was disposed of noting the deposit of the security amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 880 of 2022
Between
Mr Anil S/o Shantaram Sangtani & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Tata Capital Financial Service Ltd. …Respondent/s
Ms Dimple Tejani, i/b Mr Ajinkay J. Gargey Advocate for Appellants.
Mr Rajesh Nagori i/b, Mr R.L. Motwani, Advocate for Respondent
The amount as directed by the Tribunal has been deposited.
Post on 30.09.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-16
1
Mr. Anil S/o Shantaram Sangtani & Ors.
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
