State Bank India and Ors. v. Ms S Rasiklal and Co. and 8 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
. !
i
i
Contd Sheet
. I
i '.'i . .
O flee Notes, Appearances
Date and Registrar’s order’/ Chairperson’s Orders .
02/11/2t»<23 l^dv-Sa^e^khaj'kh Po"?T F\ppel'ajnr;
P\dv-fx/orAe' piQ®’Ftrzr i • ’ oVV'^^T^WCATrrxa1 > _ Ip fb-rr - A I J - \ VO * ^‘3
RpFeJIarM- Pi'led, se^/
. .1^ ad^dav'_ ? _u.z/A - <e-8V»cesettee i cor^P!^^
psg pe-zr- ^■e'srN'-——‘'\GC <—
Upon p»dv.O^ P-1 Q , 3 05 i<3 toj
.j£errv' ce. . o
-creeps <JP°p
pay
0^ (S«pU
peg
(^4 &7VC
Fl> Irci^sd a
■Ncp^
(V ofUir
I
SV-ep l-fw Re^
4 ^''^4
I .
■)
■I
I
I I
i
I
I
I"
FARAD
debts recovery appellate tribunal
MUMBAI
M^cAppncationNo.-.----------- .of of20 20 ,.No.
Pl 1^4 Appeal No. n T
of20|°|
- n-r-
... Appellants
(Advocate
J
Versus
■ S • kU ( Co- ccs - Respondents
(Advocate.
J
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order I Chairperson's Orders
In compliance with the
order dated 22-^y/2 •^'jpassed
by the Hon'ble Chairperson in
LA. No.^z/g-^ the Appellant
has carried out amendment in
the matter an^ /of/20^.
Registrar
1'2/031'20'23 fvdv. £>ar*nee'zr~ lA^TT lQn4~«
fvJv . Suvcrrm
"fvdl'V r l<hcin ^'^3
o V^e/zr >
ocoJ-^
Sponden'fe Q<
upon
f<2 Y2 \ dcivi •
02/11/^02^
.
ic . V&ccj)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court