No reply was filed by respondents. The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directed the appellant to amend the cause title to reflect the debt assignment to Respondent No. 9 (Bank of India).
Appellant directed to carry out amendment to cause title.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No.23/2019
Between State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. S. Rasiklal& Co. &Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Sameer Shaikh, i/b M/s. Consulta Juris, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. A. B. Shinde, Advocate for the Respondent No. 9 (Bank of India)
Order dated: 04/07/2022:-
No Reply is being filed by Respondents.
The Appellant is directed to carry out the amendment to the cause title pertaining to Respondent No. 9 which has assigned the debt to another agency. Hence, the necessary amendments may be carried out.
Post on 06.10.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-4
1
State Bank of India
M/s. S. Rasiklal& Co.
Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
