Goldie Sud v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order granting time to file Vakaltnama for the respondent bank and adjourning hearing to 31.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 204/2010
Between
Goldie Sud … Appellant/s
V/s.
Punjab National Bank …Respondent/s
AND
Misc. Appeal No. 99/2011
Between
Goldie Sud … Appellant/s
V/s.
Punjab National Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
AND
Misc. Appeal No. 110/2022
Between
Goldie Sud … Appellant/s
V/s.
Punjab National Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Vidhya P., appearing for the Appellant in person.
Ms. Vidhya P., appearing for the Appellant (PoA).
Mr. Tushar Bansode, i/b M/s. Law Focus, Advocate for
Respondents.
-: Common Order dated: 13/12/2023:-
There is a change in the Vakaltnama for the Respondent Punjab National Bank in all these appeals.
The Ld. Counsel proposing to appear for the Respondent bank seeks time to file a Vakaltnama.
1
Time is granted.
A representative of the Appellant seeks an adjournment. Post on 31.01.2024 for a hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-17 to 19
2
Goldie Sud
Punjab National Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court