Bangiya Gramin Vikas Bank v. Shri Joy Bandhu Mukherjee
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal No. 09 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
11.10.2023 Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank Ltd. and anr ... Appellants -VsShri Joy Bandhu Mukherjee & Anr ……Respondents Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel, Mr. Debasish Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Nimish Mishra, Mr. Suman Saha, Mr. Soumadip Saha, Learned Counsel for the Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that the vakalatnama was filed on behalf of Respondents on 6th October, 2023 in the Registry. But the vakalatnama itself is defective. Name of the Respondents are not mentioned in the vakalatnama. Registry is hereby directed to check the papers at the time of filing and if there is any defect, they should endorse on the defect.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for and is permitted to file a fresh vakalatnama in accordance with law. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, Mr. Nimish Mishra prays for and is granted a week’s time to file
2
opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within a week thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank Ltd. and anr
- respondent
Shri Joy Bandhu Mukherjee & Anr
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court