The Appellants failed to comply with the Tribunal's direction to make a pre-deposit. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Appeal.
Miscellaneous Appeal No.06/2022 dismissed for non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No.06/2022
Between
M/s Neil Extrulamipack Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s
V/s.
Pegasus Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. …Respondent/s Ms Sonali Jain, Advocate for Appellants.
Ms Shweta Tingle T., i/b M/s Fortis India Law, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
J. D’silva, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
The Appellants have not complied with the direction of the Tribunal to make a pre-deposit.
Hence, Misc. Appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance.
Miscellaneous if are dismissed as Applications, any,
infructuous.
mks-11
Sd/Chairperson
1
M/s Neil Extrulamipack Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Pegasus Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
