The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous appeal by default on the grounds that the appellant was not keen on prosecuting it.
Miscellaneous appeal No.36/2022 dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No.36/2022
Between
Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Sangita Mahadeo Wandhare …Respondent/s Mr Meghnath Navlani, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 24/07/2023:-
There is no representation for the Appellant.
The reply has been filed by the Respondent.
It appears that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting the misc. appeal.
Hence, Misc. Appeal is dismissed for default. Miscellaneous if are dismissed as Applications, any,
infructuous.
mks-13
Sd/Chairperson
1
Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd.
Sangita Mahadeo Wandhare
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
