Centrum Housing Finance Limited v. Vinodkumar Ashokbhai Khatri
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
|Date|;|_^dd'-y-'-, _
| Office Notes, Appearances
ind Registrar’s order _I_Chairperson’s Orders|
|---|---|---|
|CO-/O§/2023
|_l aMhJ- _
UeL.
'(Vtf app
(x
pJ
po or
4/
P\ p p-d 1 d f
AcX/' SCi|1
i
fyno&r
c^-
'
^AiZMC^
ify }!^
Z
* . . ' • f' f • ?
r ^SpOrx^^b'
o^vaco.U
+Vrvve
PN
' ^cQoazrndl
ge?rvick’ aPA’d^viH bj^
Q'S IOQ
i .
/■ zp '^D
1 '
-
‘ IiIa •’ ’' •'
7 rSltjkacJdm<br>dlarx't-
|or><aj
p^J larA-
f c e | o
t'b
**.■ > • 1**
fl
I
d ■■•-■
Vvel|
|I
2-dl>)
^/es/^|.?
>
Ativ ■ si t lf
N.or>e ■fc
. Atpa-llo-nb
£=k fl7S
?s 0=4
■'
A4J
■fc is1!|«
4
S
r' [
AeN
pe^ ~
pleh.
Due to administrative reason,
board bischargetf. IsS/ij/a-o^
iku Roy p*eJ><aoh-£sY-
Se.s'vCoe. A--£frdbxii'h 7 £^siV_iQ.
LKp>c><Vi—-. f^esporxienp} £>£j
Cippecb'ev,<3= Re4> ly 0>->4s ndj
-,
■.J
(7^4^z|
FARAD
DEBTSRECOVERYAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. of 20
In
□Appeal No. ^^Lofzogs
...Appellants
(Advocate,^ ZQx^oA * J *
Versus
...Respondents
(Advocate.
J
■V 'V
w>
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chairperson’s Orders
Appeal presented . by MU •
ov>1iV\Q_, — y.-/
Advocate for Appellant with DrD, / IPO of Rs, on
I,
being aggrieved by the impugned order / fjM^f order
passed on in S.A, / Q<A<No.^2.^ of^Z^L,
'I
by DRT, EE,JW> _ u/s 2^R.D.D.D.&-r I Acrn/iJ3 / 18 of
i
S.A.R.F.A.e's.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - I Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance Io / OS/ *9
REGISTRAR
^as^}3> Zo^z /ty> w/s.. divim
44/, A/A^zls/k
d. atyU4rf^%t>i<2, 'T^'
______________
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court