Jm Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Private Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^1?^ --•-
I 'officeOffice Notes,Notes, AppearancesAppearances
Date
[and Reg strar’s order I Chairperson's Orders
ll" 1 _
r?2o/i’ . '5 ■• ■■i
'jf-
•Yi i
Q • . ...
I
' : / - . ■
OQfOgnoQS rNor>e fbir bo -vh' 4-Kf r
. PerrwoJ det^ec-bs >ro
Adj Pott
l
^3 /o 9 •' r ■ -
I
)
I I c.
!
28/0912023 Due +o HoVi’dqj eJecleq^reJ or> ^S3
j.
O\n ac.coiiH cSfy ZTei— lod ,
GoaTrd dis c^G2rged J ■^■-. ' r^^S/O./QO^ \ '■. ‘ ‘ ' ' ' .-
i
i ■ ■'.'
i . I
I
^•U/'ZOQS Pid^ -Som^ a pcrzr PppeJIanb •
L_
r
j
CKoh<« ‘ i
>;
I
<br>- Vi
i K- Peg fc+'^'zr -
!l
i
i
■ L ■’r
CJ 'i
I
~r
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERYAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MlIMRAi
Mlsc Applicationin No. ________ of 20 -A-Ncr'.
^Appeal No. 20^-5 J>//V
v//^
Si
<L£}'
...Appellants
(Advocate T 1^’
Versus
-R^pondento
}. (Advocate —- -------------------- J
Data Office Notes, Appearances
A andReglstrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders
Appeal presented .. by /^rfT~Z-£^*>=rurem> - ,
‘ ’ l _ a
Advocate forA^ellanl with CUD, / iP€> of Rs. on '
♦
|0 being aggrieved by the .impugned order / order
passed on 2.^23 in s A>No of ^,^21
I by DRTr-A^^(Ao4 u/s 7finf R n.n n.» p | nct .ing^ / 18 of
i
S.A.R.F.A.e's.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - 1 Appeal Memo
h.
S.O. for compliance to 02-06^2.02. '^
REGISTRAR
a os&&
The Regisirar is on leave, Hence, the Board is Discharged
S.O Fbr /^cnnpl/nnreto O.fa/
. Registrar“(Kc)7’
ip"
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090007222023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court