Appellants in DRAT appeal MA(S.A)17/2022 were absent despite adjournments granted for their convenience. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for default as the appellants failed to prosecute it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A(S.A):17/2022
K.C.Palanishamy & Ors V/S State Bank Of India
09/05/2023
No representation for appellants.
Ld. Counsel for respondent bank reported ready.
The matter is posted to 27.4.2023 under caption ‘for dismissal’, as appellants were absent on 19.4.2022. On 27.4.2022, at request of advocate for appellants, matter is adjourned to this date under the same caption of dismissal in order to give an opportunity to them to proceed with the case. In spite of that, appellants evinced no interest in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, Appeal MA (SA) 17/2022 is dismissed for default.
Sd/Chair Person
K.C.Palanishamy & Ors
State Bank Of India
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
