Common order by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai granting the respondent-appeal bank four weeks to file replies in three miscellaneous appeals and fixing post for reply/hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 158/2022
Between
Shri Vishnukumar S/o Rambilas Modi … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s
And
Misc. Appeal No. 157/2022
Between
M/s. Shanti Rice Mill, through its Proprietor … Appellant/s Shri. Vishnukumar S/o Ramvilas Modi V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s And Misc. Appeal No. 156/2022
Between
M/s. Natraj Sortex, through its Proprietor … Appellant/s Shri Natwar S/o Vishnukumar Modi V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr. Radhe Agrawal, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Raj D, i/b M/s. Utangale & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Common Order dated: 28/02/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank in all these three appeals seeks time to file replies.
Replies shall be filed within four weeks. Post on 16.05.2023 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-11-12-13
1
Shri Vishnukumar S/o Rambilas Modi
M/s. Shanti Rice Mill, through its Proprietor Shri. Vishnukumar S/o Ramvilas Modi
M/s. Natraj Sortex, through its Proprietor Shri Natwar S/o Vishnukumar Modi
State Bank of India
Mr Justice Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
