Raju Mithailal Dube v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai listed a matter for an adjournment to 02.01.2024 regarding the handover of property possession.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 137/2023
Between
Raju Mithailal Dube … Appellant/s V/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
An advocate for the Appellant is present.
Mr Santosh Bhide i/b M/s Bhide & Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr Sanjay D. i/b Mr B. Dhongade, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 &3.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the possession of the subject property was ready to be handed over to the bank but none appeared for the bank to take possession.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the first Respondent bank submits that the bank is willing to take over possession tomorrow by 2.30 pm.
Call the matter on 02.01.2024.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-08
1
Raju Mithailal Dube
ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court