A miscellaneous appeal before the Authorities under the SARFAESI Act. The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the Appellant to be heard ex-parte due to the Respondent's continuous absence after fixing a post-dated date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 126/2009
Between
Indusind Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Sales Tax Officer, Pune & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Gajendra A. Rajput, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 03/01/2023:-
The counsel for the Appellant is ready for the hearing but there is no representation for the Respondent on the last several dates of the hearing.
This matter was in 2009 and needs to be heard expeditiously.
No further indulgence could be granted. In case the Respondent is not represented on the next date of hearing they would be set ex-parte.
Post on 08.03.2023 for hearing.
psa-16
1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
