Pratima Arun Parekh v. Export Import Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(
FARAD 1
11
debts recovery APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. of 20
In . I. No.
Appeal No. ? Oon
ON. do • ii 1^2003 .
G:, ’ >-
i A'arun |c’ct'Er"'il ... Appellants
PrciJ-i'ma
(Advocate Rang a PtnJI Co .
J
i
i
Versus | * , i
E'X'po'z-)- ZTrr^oi5^~ Gan/< !? P 3 nd 1
Respondents
(Advocate,
Date Office Notes, Appearance^
and Registrar’s order / Chairperson'^ Orders
Since all Office Objections are rer icved
the appeal be numbered and regi ‘.:rod
as MiscellaneousAppea /A£$e£
LLZJ
S.OJReg ar
O4/OJ/2023 pdv , /^aJ muJftTH Pow Appdlan+-
pjK/- Shairnya Pott PH .
plOY>e POTT o P^po^^n-P .
le Z^P-epljJ P~'2- tonFrS
Adj Fo-v P'PP®OTr,<€
03 ^o'JS .
Adj
■20/05 1^02.3 '.pdy Po2F Appellcn-b
. ftd's/ * ShaTJ'nyq Arzr P 4h
fMon-e/^Tf iQ^s^omden-^Jl./j-Li.
I I 1
fX<l/occjJ--e CbTf A pp eJ I a V— 5'obrv>(H~'W -J-Ha/
|l »\d . aJ 2red Jq 1 cj
ge/W f co. oiPA'd av f a'
kl _ | rvd^’O^s'
Service 1'5 Cok^p'-^^ c— '- u/fom arj'
L oF
fvdj Pott. fAppedtfance
to 61/H 10.013
-TIL . ^aP2T'
P.T.O.X_„
i
I
(Advocate,
‘ i-
J
Contd Sheet
| . Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders |
|---|---|
| O/^/2cr23 06/12/^6'23 |
<0 OG/l^/^02a. ' IL T < R-^ fo 02^0^120-2^, ftdv-X/vShcd “Iorr\b-e Pott App£Jtar-h- fXcJ-^/ '.SHazrnyq Pb^rP-l IMorxe FoTT o-V^SeiT p-esponde^'b' - fMj Fott fippea^ce P^pUj oF Ac^-X/ickjash'&'i Fg-zt Appellant• None Pott P-esporxden'F • ''Un - , < |
| i- | i' f f J 1. |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court