In two miscellaneous appeals from 2008 before the DRT Appeals Tribunal at Mumbai, no representation was filed by the appellant. The Chairperson, assuming lack of interest in prosecuting the appeals, dismissed both for default without further discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 113/2008
Between
Prakash Manjunath Pai V/s.
IFCI Ltd. & Ors.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Mr Akbar Rezvi, i/b M/s AKS Legal, Advocate for Respondents Nos. 3 & 4.
And
Misc. Appeal No. 297/2008
Between
Prakash Manjunath Pai … Appellant/s V/s.
Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Akbar Rezvi, i/b M/s AKS Legal, Advocate for Respondents Nos. 1 & 2.
-: Common Order dated: 14/03/2023:-
There is no representation for the Appellant in both this appeals. I assume that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting the appeals.
The appeals are of the year 2008. Both appeals are dismissed for default.
Misc. Application, if any, is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-11-12
1
Prakash Manjunath Pai
IFCI Ltd.
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
