Madhukar R Bhangay v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order during dictation noting need for re-hearing and listing the matter for further hearing on a future date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 195 of 2019
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
17.08.2023 Madhukar R. Bhangay
….Appellant
-Vs-
State Bank of India&Ors.
... Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
During the course of dictation, I found that the matter requires re-hearing. Accordingly, the case is listed on 20th November, 2023 for further hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated the 17th August, 2023
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Madhukar R. Bhangay
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court