Kishor Jaiswal v. I I F L Home Finance Limited and Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 12/2023 Date: 02.05.2023
Present : Shri Akhil Agnihotri, Advocate holding brief of Shri Shailesh Tiwari, counsel for the appellant, Shri Ashish Melhotra, counsel for the applicant/respondentF.I.,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Shailesh Tiwari is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant on the urgency application being I.A. No. 329/2023.
After hearing, this court finds that no good ground has been made out regarding urgency in the matter. Accordingly, the urgency application being I.A. No. 329/2023 is rejected. Let the case be listed on the date already fixed i.e. 03.07.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shailesh Tiwari
- respondent
Ashish Melhotra
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court