Kallapalli Satheeshkumar v. Dcb Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the total dues to admit the miscellaneous appeal. The appellant had failed to comply with earlier DRT orders regarding deposit of the loan amount.
What did the court decide?
Appeal to be heard on admission if Appellant deposits 50% of total amount due.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 620 of 2023 (Arising out of I.A. 1951 of 2023 in S.A.353 of 2021 of DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 18.10.2023 | Sri Kallapalli Sathee |
sh Kumar … Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| -Vs- | ||
| DCB Bank Limited | … Respondent |
Mr. T. Jeevan, Learned Counsel for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
Heard the Learned Counsel for Appellant and perused the record.
The order 23rd August, 2023 is under challenge wherein the Learned DRT, dismissing I.A. 1951 of 2023, directed the Appellant to deposit the total loan amount with interest and other costs. As would appear from the record that on 7th April, 2022 an interim order was passed by the Learned DRT asking the applicant to deposit 25% of the notice amount within ten days and remaining balance amount in five equal monthly instalments and the Respondent, Financial Institution, was restrained from taking physical possession in pursuance of the Possession Notice dated 7th September, 2021. In case of default, Bank would be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. It appears that compliance of this order was not made. Fresh I.A. was filed with the assertion that 25% amount is paid. However, during the course of the hearing, Learned Counsel submits
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri Kallapalli Satheesh Kumar
- respondent
DCB Bank Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 191090006202023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court