Jm Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Private Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
T
| Date | a | Office Notes, Appearances nd Registrar's order /Chairperson’s Orders |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/0g/2023 | Cxlorxe P*dj P "29 /O9/'2-O'2 |
_2r_ “XfC- 0, : I . ..,■• t bo+An pa2r-Vi<£- W Rer^o vdj odeJP<cA-s to . 3 |
I 'J . _r _ ••.V £*• |
| 23/03/20'23 ^3/11/2023 |
I <•’ On qccourv GoaTJcI disc Ne_xt- doJ P\dv-Somyq iNor'-e Poo" P Pdv-ApdeJ <dePecVs- Ml' Fo?r Perv \a£A C nC€ Dae -Po Mol |
I ! • » •■? / *Z7/c- f^fsf'azj - e'- I ‘day dee^a^ed on ^.s/pg^OS^ - oFi Td - e- mi \q-J |
7> ViOTTged . -.. be 'ZS / I l./zo^. Pott1 /^ppeJlpn 1— e^ponckn'b • IOryP Vinnc frzT f^emo^aJoC ! , ^voJ oP dePec+s \5/o |
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBA5
. Mlsc ApplicationIn No. of 20 ^rNoT_
lAppeaf No. _ ^2-1 of 20.2
1
1 ,-p/^
^rP Ujvvix' k
(Advocate Al' 2k
J
Versus
Aa a a ...Respondents
py^. /<^ Lltr^jc^
(Advocate _ _
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chairperson's Orders
by -^LE) :
Appeal presented .
Advocate for Appellant with GkD^Sfe of Rs. ' orb
’ ? i ■ .i J
being aggrieved by the impugned order /^Jjwdl order
passed on in S.A. / jXl^Jo.1 of 2-t^/S
by DRTr- A u/s 20 of R.D.D.B.& F I Act W93 / '18 of
. I
S.A.R.F.A.e's.I. Act. 2002.’' f nv/' !
■f
( : Exh - 'I Appeal Memo
f
S.O. for compliance to 02/0^/900.3
REGISTRAR
CD ^Zp
Registrar (|/C)
P.T.C).
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090007212023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court