Intiaz Ahmed v. State Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. /11/2023 Date: 17/03/2023
IntiazAhmed -------- Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India & Ors.------- Respondents
None appears for appellant and respondents both.
The matter was listedtoday for removal of remaining one defect at Sl. No.(vi) i.e. the case number is wrongly mentioned in para No. 6 in the fresh appeal received on 13.02.2023 in compliance of order dated 03/01/2023.
It is found that Ld. Counsel for Appellant sent a scanned copy of the pagethrough e-mail on 10/03/2023, mentioning it to be a corrected copyin respect of removalof above defect.
This appeal being Dy. No. 11 of 2023 was received by poston 02/01/2023 filed by Ld. Counsel, Ms. Anita Das on behalf of Intiaz Ahmed.On scrutiny of the application nine numbers of defects were observed and accordingly an order was passed on 03.01.2023 for removal of these defects.
There after the case was listed four times including a notice to the appellant.But by evening on13.02.2023 this office received some documents by post from the Ld. Counsel for appellant towards removal of defects as mentioned in the order dated 03.01.2023. On scrutiny of these documents it was found that except defect mentioned in sl. no.(vi) of the order,all other defects are been removed. Then the case was posted again on 17.03.2023 for removal of the remaining defect in sl. no. (vi)as mentioned in order dated 21.02.2023.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be registered given the uncorrected defect in the case number mentioned in a specific paragraph.
Whether the failure of the appellant to physically appear warrants declining registration of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
IntiazAhmed
- respondent
State Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court