Indian Bank v. Dr B S Dayanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai refused a request for further time to file a representation. Consequently, Interim Application 125/2023 was dismissed for non-prosecution, and Appeal AIR (SA) 456/2022 was rejected.
What did the court decide?
IA 125/2023 dismissed; Appeal AIR (SA) 456/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 125/2023
in
A.IR:456/2022
A.O.,Indian Bank V/S Dr.B.S.Dayanithi
24/11/2023
No representation for respondent.
Advocate representing petitioner /appellant bank sought further time despite the matter is posted today under the caption of ‘dismissal’. Request for further time is refused.
In view of the same, IA 125/2023 (Delay) is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, Appeal AIR (SA) 456/2022 is rejected.
Sd/Chairperson
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant extension of time despite dismissal caption?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.O.,Indian Bank
- respondent
Dr.B.S.Dayanithi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court