around Rs.50 Lakhs, why a property worth more than it, was brought for Sale at Rs.1.60 Crores. Learned Presiding Officer recorded that the Bank has not answered this. If such plea is taken by Borrowers in its Securitisation Application, then, it is the duty of Bank to answer the same, and if it is not answered, then, adverse inference can be drawn. But, when no such plea is raised, finding fault with Bank, for not answering it, in my view, is nothing but, a perverse thinking. Tribunal below recorded that the property can be distinguishably severable. I fail to comprehend, how a building in a site can be distinguishably severable without effecting partition. I also fail to comprehend, how one floor can be sold without partitioning the site in which building is constructed. Tribunal below went on saying that by selling one floor, the loan can be discharged, which in my view, is not a correct thinking. As rightly pointed out by Advocate for Bank, Tribunal below allowed SA 11/2022 mainly focusing that the property is
