Bank of Baroda v. E-Star Infotech Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
MUMBAI
|Mlsc Application
In|||no.
No. _________ ©f 20|
|---|---|
|Appeal
■’T-A '|... Appellants
No. •'2S4
of 20 °J3
No • Q9Q./rzocx3
GcktsxS dq .|
|(Advocate|JQ ■
i
}|
||Respondents
Versus
TrsPoT5''kecH
lU|
|(Advocate fit|va'isWj pQ-yf JekaTyr-
J|
|Date|Office Notes, Appearand
^nrl R on I® friMi
unice Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order/Chairperson’s Orders|
|O^/n (2003
IM 10^/2023|Pots' P^h'rxg P<plj
06 //I /^-o^3.
< 'H
o m'
Pricm}- rS -^hi
Ptcb/’ p'zrarG’i-a £hicde
p\ek/' SV>o<clad V<han
Mv/- ^ots- Pppdlcirvb
Do-IbtoiJ
-- '■ ****y -
2T p
-*»
S&glQS^C^eJrasicie Fx-pct'er^eJ .
PAv-Pctt Appebav^ -
-
cJ^P^cbs
I I
2.0^3'
**Ro^r.HppeJla^^
r-1 FQ .
(\ezJ tP-epljj bo ’lACOn/J’-*
Ik / c
’
bn-zr Appel (an4- •
Po'zr P - |
.
pvckoCciJ-^ Po^ p<^or4krYk Pi'IeJ^VP
.
1 Vh _f\IO C _oP ea'JS’ij
q ppj j' coJ-k°n _~ _t
O?M«T57
j
f^ppeJl^^b
Vo ++>€L q^pliccJ-i
A4r iPeplj
ndd
Acl/4 gcns'S’hq PqttcJ^. l<a?|
4.
i
. >-% 1
odvoCcXbC o /\a/
**sbob'Je **ET^P^
L.|
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court