Allowed

Tirupati Tirumala Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. State Bank of India

DRAT4 Dec 2023IA/758/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed an interim application in an appeal challenging SARFAESI measures. The Court rejected the Grounds regarding sub-delegation and OTS rejection. It directed the Appellants to deposit ₹ 1.70 crores as pre-deposit under Section 18(1) with a stay conditional upon payment.

What did the court decide?

Appellants directed to deposit ₹ 1.70 crores in four instalments; stay granted upon payment of first instalment.

Tirupati Tirumala Hotels Pvt. Ltd. versus State… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | DRAT (2023)

¶1

BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 758/2023 (WoD)

¶2

In Appeal on Diary No. 2045/2023

¶3

Between

¶4

M/s. Tirupati Tirumala Hotels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. The Authorized Officer, …Respondent/s State Bank of India Mr. Ashish Killedar, Advocate for Appellants.

¶5

-: Order dated: 04/12/2023:-

¶6

The Appellant is in appeal impugning the order dated 01.11.2023 in I.A. No. 2278/2023 in S.A. No. 137/2022 on the files of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur (D.R.T). wherein the Ld. Presiding Officer refused to grant any interlocutory relief in favour of the Appellants to stall the Sarfaesi measures initiated by the Respondent bank against the secured assets under the provisions of Sec. 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. (“SARFAESI Act” for short) Act.

¶7

The Appellant had received a notice u/s. 13 (2) of the SARFAESI Act demanding a sum of ₹ 4,67,05,983/- as of 15.02.2018. The Appellants paid a sum of ₹ 77,34,000/- consequent to an OTS proposal. Further payments agreed to be made as per the proposal were not made, and therefore, the bank initiated Sarfaesi measures.

¶8

¶9

The Appellants thereafter made a further payment of ₹ 50,00,000/- towards the amount due and came up with a fresh OTS proposal which was rejected by the bank stating that an amount of more than ₹ 6 crores was due from the Appellant.

¶10

In the S.A., the Appellant challenges the Sarfaesi measures taken by the Respondent Bank u/s. 14 stating that though the order passed by the District Magistrate directs the Tahsildar to take possession of the property, notice to take possession of the property was issued by the Naib-Tahsildar and therefore there is subdelegation of the duty assigned to the Tahsildar which is not permissible. The other ground taken by the Appellants is that they are willing to pay the amount and that the OTS proposal was improperly rejected.

¶11

Regarding the sub-delegation of the taking over a possession u/s. 14 by the Naib-Tahsildar, it can be rectified by a direction issued by the DRT that the possession shall only be taken by the Tahsildar as directed by the order made u/s. 14. Therefore, that may not be a valid ground for challenging the Sarfaesi measures.

¶12

The acceptance or rejection of an OTS proposal is the prerogative of the creditor bank and the borrower cannot insist on the OTS proposal being accepted by the bank. Hence, the rejection of the OTS proposal is also not a sufficient ground for challenging the Sarfaesi measures. The Appellants have not produced any documents to indicate that they are under financial strain.

¶13

The amount demanded u/s. 13 (2) is ₹ 4,67,05,983/- towards which there was a payment of ₹ 1,27,00,000/- subsequent interest

¶14

¶15

has also accrued. According to the Respondent bank, there is an outstanding due of ₹ 6 crores.

¶16

However, the Respondent bank did not appear to contest this appeal and, therefore, said ex-parte. The threshold amount for paying the pre-deposit contemplated u/s. 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act is the amount mentioned in the demand notice. The Appellant has paid a certain amount towards that amount but subsequent interest has also accrued. Even if credit is given to the amount that was paid, there will still be a balance of about ₹ 3.5 crores.

¶17

The Appellants are, therefore, directed to deposit a sum of ₹ 1.70 crores as pre-deposit. The said amount shall be paid in four instalments within a gap of two weeks each, as stated hereunder.

¶18

Numbers of Instalments Payment on or before
1^stInstalment₹38,00,000/- 18.12.2023
2^ndInstalment₹44,00,000/- 01.01.2024
3^rdInstalment₹44,00,000/- 15.01.2024
4^thInstalment₹44,00,000/- 29.01.2024

¶19

On payment of the 1^st instalment within the stipulated time, the Appellants are entitled to a stay of the further Sarfaesi measures intended to be taken by the Respondent bank. Breach of payment of any of the instalments shall entail dismissal of the appeal.

¶20

The amount shall be deposited in the form of a Demand Draft with the Registrar of this Tribunal.

¶21

¶22

As and when the said amounts are deposited, they shall be invested in term deposits in the name of Registrar, DRAT, Mumbai, with any nationalised bank, initially for 13 months, and thereafter to be renewed periodically.

¶23

With these observations, the I.A. is disposed of. The Respondent is at liberty to file a reply in the Appeal with an advance copy to the other side.

¶24

Post on 19.12.2023 for reporting compliance regarding the 1^st instalment.

¶25

Chairperson

¶26

rm-3

¶27

Tirupati Tirumala Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tirupati Tirumala Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mr. Karunamoy Kridhnachand Chakravarty versus Union Bank of India and Ors.

Deepak Harkishandas Mirchandani versus the D C B Bank Ltd.

Bank of Baroda versus State Bank of India and Ors.

Wateredge Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. versus State Bank of India

Ramnath Singh versus Punjab National Bank

Phorum Jigneshbhai Brahmbhatt and Anr. versus Punjab National Bank