Union Bank of India v. Kamalakar Narasimha Bhandari
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date | _'': _Office.Motos, Appearances and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders |
|
|---|---|---|
| PqMicc^'ovf ts&w |
||
| IJ /of/'So'SQ) 1G/O8,/'2O23 CRIO3/20® |
I? ^Rcply to ^^31 ^•23 1 "-Z"?• ^SjIhS' . K Due toadministrative reason,. board discharged. 30/1° Z'20'23 Adv* Vi Shod Tarnbe Appellant N one fc'zr pesporxder>. Adj . l2to'Zr P05' Appea-znance _hr _/6 M^23» |
. > '•- : 'H |
| 30/10/2023 | ’rNorie roTT boH'"' Adj fezr AOS ./nppefiRnince 'Lr ^’/I'S/Zo^. TIC Rjy is-MtK |
;'.'.""’'FARAD-
BEBTS_RECOVERYAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI] MIscApp^onNo. o(2(J. CCO^ ln -------- — - -----.0(20 u’.*u I. No. _______ Appeal No. „ of 20 Ihvo#) ^4^ 0/ ... Appellants (Advocats
Vorsus
r .>
A/r, ^cu^Jaj^A-. A/, /hyTT>
...RgopondnnU
(Advocate __
1 '
Oslo Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chalrpersbn'o Ordero ‘
fyc^. ^aJ^djc fad' 'KOf dd- sfjiQaJ fiLefair)
Nb 'J^ri /Z^OAjJ^di V
G^Mcud-
A- ci^dL by
Pafa PahU^^rlxd
M edsde hi/ m®/ ‘d
r
/yj
cm p/oyfaiS
I?(o7/&>2/3
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court