Hashmi Sayed Nisar Ahmed Sayed Murtuza v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Note: This is an adjournment order. The court deferred consideration of the instant application to a later date after the respondent bank requested time to file a reply.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 490/2023 (WoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 1215/2023
Between
Hashmi Sayed Nisar Ahmed Sayed Murtuza … Appellant/s
V/s.
…Respondent/s
State Bank of India & Ors. Mr R.P. Adgaonkar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr P. B. Gujar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Bank.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of praecipe dated 17.07.2023 filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Ld. Counsel proposes to appear for the Respondent Bank and seeks time to file a reply to the application for waiver of deposit.
The reply shall be filed expeditiously.
Await appearance of the rest of the Respondents who have been served, adjourned to 24.08.2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hashmi Sayed Nisar Ahmed Sayed Murtuza
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court