Kusum M Agarwal v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court granted an adjournment to the appellant to file a rejoinder and to the respondent to correct its reply in two interrelated appeals.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 471/2022 (WoD)
In
Appeal on Diary No. 731/2022
Between
Kusum M Agarwal … Appellant/s V/s. Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
AND
I.A. No. 472/2022 (WoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 732/2022
Between
Naresh Kumar Gupta HUF … Appellant/s V/s. Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Puneet Gogad, i/b Mr. Kushal Sawant, Advocate for Appellant. An Advocate for the Respondent is present.
-: Common Order dated: 14/07/2023:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be granted for filing a rejoinder and correcting the reply.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kusum M Agarwal
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
- appellant
Naresh Kumar Gupta HUF
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court