The DrAT directed the appellant to approach the 2nd respondent for a possible settlement at the earliest and denied further time extension.
Settle outside court post 12.05.2023; no further time granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Misc. Appeal No. 123/2022
Between
Lokesh Janardha n Waghmare & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. The Authorized O fficer, …Respondent/s Union Bank of I n dia & Anr. Ms. Durga Son i , i/b M/s. RAD Law Associat e s, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Nainesh Ami n , Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. R.K. Thakka r , Advocate for Respondent No.2.
-: Order dated: 12/04/2023:-
The Appell a nt seeks further time to arrive at a settlement. The Counsel appeari n g for Respondent No. 2 submits t h at the Appellant has not approac h ed the Respondent for any settl e ment and hence the Counsel for t h e Appellant is directed to instruc t the Appellant to approach the 2nd R espondent for a possible settlem e nt at the earliest. No further time will be granted. Post on 12. 0 5.2023 for reporting settlement.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-16
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further time should be granted to the appellant to arrive at a settlement.
Lokesh Janardhan Waghmare & Anr.
The Authorized Officer
Union Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
