Appeal dismissed for non-payment of pre-deposit required for entertaining the appeal. The appellants failed to adhere to deposit timelines, leading to dismissal.
Extension of time to deposit pre-deposit dismissed; Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A.No.435/2023 (EoT) In
Appeal on Diary No. 52/2023
Between
Gajanan Prabhakar Burghate & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
Indian Bank …Respondent/s
Mr Ajikumar, i/b M/s. VNA Legal, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 07/09/2023:-
Vide order dated 22.06.2023, the Appellants were directed to deposit a sum of ₹46 lakhs as pre-deposit for entertaining the appeal.
1
extension of time to deposit the amount.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-8
2
Gajanan Prabhakar Burghate & Anr.
Indian Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
