Union Bank of India v. Mrs. Indumati Nagindas Sanghavi
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>L
N...''.
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELATE TRIBUNAL
* ■ . MUMBAI
?
Mlsc Application No. . J;' nfr : ‘ .
In _____ —OF 20 I. No.
•'!
Appeal No. of 20 23
i
:■ <-■» ... Appellants v
J
(Advocate
j
Versus
J
(^ebjnyd^ NOgmclOA j / ...Respondents
I
(Advocate. - ■ I ■ ■• ■ .1
J
A • • - - •; -h '■■• f ••'
II i.' —
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order/fchalrperaon’s Orders
;?//ci7/2u^3, f bty ^4^, N&fycA K ^n7//u
' • •
^eJ'-
>1^
-£hk-U^l
y. K
I
fa
l‘ fa^O&d "fa '^ ’
r ?
'4 »
•7< t .
^Tpi A ;
o^J^ro-
06/ <9^12023.
. .: • • . » ■ ■ ! b
? ■ < - ■ -
■
I
4
J
P.T.O.
Contd Sheet
| Date | Office Notes, Appear and Registrar’s order / Chairp |
ances erson's Orders |
|---|---|---|
| 0 6/03/20^ | rQes'Fon pc^v < Pzra clr'^a I3amin£ Po'ZT Adv Sanjonq Crthogcrere Ao rNor\e FotT o4-h£'?r AdvocaH Pcrzr P- _it> _R- m P' Viaj Rep'j . Adj.fbTT tfep'j <22/0 |
"i I 5— cfen^. ^■eel< lAme tt iQ-^4e.P-4j) 5/^^ |
| xa/o 3/2,0, | Due to administrative reas board discharged. I^/h |
on, 'f |
| 144/\l/26'23 0^10.10.^03 14/1010.003 |
P^J - Pu'zrM^e'er tasA- cV\ar>c AcAv ■ 'PeracAnk |
Q GQmr< P tNOrv-e <2©'tr Pesporxclen'P; * Adj PbTTR'epVy oP i os ’ - - fidy Pyadrcj fb^ fAp AcK/. SnuBham Pott IQ-V Ac^j FotT P^P'J oP R-l -+o AasA- chance- Adv o<i nes H A VS rJo^e'fer Respondent . |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court