Jitendra a. Pathak v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a miscellaneous appeal where the court extended the hearing. A status quo order was allowed to remain in place.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 101/2022
Between
Jitendra A. Pathak V/s. Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
An advocate for the Appellant is present.
Mr Sachin Koli, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 Bank.
-: Order dated: 02/06/2023:-
Post on 20.06.2023 for further hearing.
Status-quo order shall continue.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-14
1
Jitendra A. Pathak
Bank of Maharashtra
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court