The Appellant argued the matter was infructuous. The bank officer was present. The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal as infructuous.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 446/2022 (Stay)
In
Misc. Appeal No. 58/2022
Between
Indian Overseas Bank …Appellant/s
V/s.
M/s. Dilshad Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd and Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Rajesh Dubey , along with Mr. Nishant Gupta (Law Officer), Advocate for Appellant Bank.
Mr Gaurang Kinkhabwala, i/b Mr Sunil Humbre, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 02/06/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the
matter has now become infructuous.
The officer of the Appellant Bank is present.
Since the S.A. has been heard and posted for orders, the appeal
is therefore disposed of as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-15
1
Indian Overseas Bank
M/s. Dilshad Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
